Infidel




Misteryosa (see also Alleba, Sassy Lawyer)

The Philippines and Malta are the only nations in the world where divorce is not (yet) legal...I strongly believe that divorce should be legalize in the Philippines.



I've been saying this to friends and family for more than a decade now, way back when the anti-divorce countries are more numerous. Sigh. Not only are we one of the most corrupt country in Asia, but apparently our civil liberties are being threatened as well.



It is my opinion that legalizing divorce, not just any divorce but a no-fault divorce, will curb the incidence of extramarital affairs. This is not some theoretical muttering of course - men and women who wanted to end a marriage and start a new life with someone else, end up being entangled in a web of deceit and lies. With a no-fault divorce law there will be less reason to stay in a marriage if you don't want to (My mother said divorce cannot be legislated because of alimony - male chauvanistic lawmakers perhaps?).



One of the favorite tactic used by the lobbyists from the anti-divorce faction (the Roman Catholic Church), is to use circular logic - "Permitting divorce causes more divorce, therefore we should ban divorce." Huh? This is like saying "There is a God because the Bible said so." You can't prove God by using the Bible because the argument would cancel itself out: "The Bible is true because God said so." See? It's illogical - it's like saying "Turtles can fly because some ancient book said so, the ancient book is true because the turtle said so."



If legalizing divorce causes more divorce, then why do nations from around the world have different divorce rates? Clearly there are other factors in divorce apart from divorce itself. Invalid circular logic cannot be a plausible argument for divorce because then we have to ban marriage itself: "Permitting marriage causes more divorce therefore we should ban marriage." See? Illogical.




Sassy Lawyer

I don’t know that God created anything or if there is God at all. I do know that gays and lesbians are a fact.



Ratzinger a homophobe? Talk about echoes of Hitler. Is Ratzinger still a Nazi? Choose which is better: Ratzinger banning rock music from Vatican or him issuing a coverup memo to transfer rapist priests?

Waiting for a reform from Vatican? Don't Hold your Breath.




Benj

After the government crackdown on internet activity in China, this latest development in Egypt sure sends a chilling effect to those bloggers who express their dissent with religion and their country’s government. Aside from Kareem, the Egyptian government is currently prosecuting 21 bloggers for similar charges.



I said it before, and I'll say it again, the Internet should be as democratic as possible. Remember when the Feds attempted to pry on Google’s Data? Or how about last month, when Youtube deleted an atheist video, voicing his opinion that the Koran is a violent book? Or how about China blocking blogspot? Or how about the Egyptian blogger, sentenced to jail for questioning the fundamentalist Muslims of his country?





Jessica Zafra (Mirror)

To counter Wikipedia, which they find to be “liberal, anti-Christian, and anti-American”, the American conservative right hath created Conservapedia...The American religious right: Stephen Colbert’s unpaid writers pool.



Jessica is right, reading Conservapedia is like watching the Colbert Show. Hitler defeated Stalin? Global Warming Scientists can't be trusted? Atheist are evil? Ah, the joys of factual highs - Conservapedia indeed. Although I have to admit they are right on one aspect - most of the world's top scientists are irreligious.




Sorsi

I’ve always had an aversion for anything that is overly religious. Don’t get me wrong…I’m not an atheist or a pagan (as my bro-in-law calls me)…I just do not subscribe to any organized religion and hate religious fanaticism that borders on being too self-righteous and ‘exclusivist’ (”we’re the only right religion, all of you will burn in hell”).



Anyway, I still took a chance on the book…even if it could turn out to be another “I Kissed Dating Goodbye” a book I threw in the garbage can…but picked up again after I realized I just borrowed the book from someone.



I don't know why, but I find most self-help book grating (for a good satire see Jessica Zafra's Chicken Pox for the Soul). Noemi is right when she said that "there are times we might have sought out, created or re-created situations that victimized us." Mix Oprah ala Kris Aquino peppered with Dr. Phil on the Jerry Springer show and you have the essence of what most self-help books are: religious undertones of Freudian pscyhoanalytic babbling - i'm a victim so are you don't worry be happy stay positive thinking car salesman testimonial post-modernity secret?




Euri
Dearest lord,



I beseech you, my lord, please hear the sincerest prayers from the bottom of this loyal follower's heart. You, the savior of my lustful desires, please hear me, oh my dear god, Gackt-sama.



To start of with, forgive me for saying that your songs as of late, bored me to death and your new look doesn't arouse me one bit. Even though I say such things, I still think that your voice is more seductive than Hyde-sama's and you are still the sexiest man alive. Yes, sexier than any actor and I really mean it... So, my dear lord, please let all those who wanted to buy your albums be broke until the day I have the time to get my ass to the said mall and buy them.



With bloody knees, I am kneeling in your almost naked image to grant this selfish wish and in exchange, I promise to be your loyal fan for always, listen to your sweet seductive voice as I stare and lust for your desirable image each night from that day forth that I get my hands on them until the day that I find a new god to worship on which would take a few more years.



In solemn prayer,

You lunatic fan.


Amen? laughing




buwayahman of Philippines for Men

This is one of the most common myths. Believers have an impression that atheists suffered some traumatic experience and as a consequence have chosen to reject God. The thought process is totally erroneous. Atheists hate god in the same way that adults hate Santa Claus. It is an absurd concept to hate something that one believes does not exist. As a non-believer, I am emotionally neutral about god. For me, he just does not exist.


In the words of Scott Adams: "Atheism is religion the same way that NOT collecting stamps is a hobby."




Drive by Shooter

Yes, God blogs. Sometimes, in fact, through no fault of His own, of course, His checks bounce.



A man was arrested from encashing a check from God. When someone asked of God about the Euros, He answered: "I only love America. Haven’t you heard?" (*Joke Hint* Christianity is dwindling in Europe. Pope called Europe a Post-Christian continent).





See Also:



12 comments:

  1. lateralus (20 March, 2007 01:18)

    Thanks for linking, man. The Divorce Issue really needs to be resolved soon. People will break up regardless of the law is passed or not.

    jumper (21 March, 2007 07:23)

    "Permitting divorce causes more divorce, therefore we should ban divorce."

    Permitting divorce will definitely increase the divorce rate. Why am I sure of that? It's cuz prior to the legalization of divorce, there was no such thing as a divorce - hence, the starting point is 0%, and there's nowhere for the divorce rate to go but up. :D

    However, "increase the divorce rate" and "cause divorce" are different things. Permitting/legalizing divorce will most certainly do the 1st, but will it also do the 2nd?

    On one hand, we could say that couples who divorce when the divorce law is passed are going to separate anyways, regardless of whether divorce is legalized or not. Hence in that sense, permitting divorce does not really "cause" divorce.

    On the other hand, there are couples who are on the "brink", who, if there was no way out for them in their marriage, would've done something to work out their problems. Of course, we're not saying all of them will succeed, but it certainly won't be a stretch to say that some of them will work out. If divorce was legal, some of these couples, who would've tried to work out their marriage if they couldn't divorce, will most probably choose the "easier way" and divorce. Hence in this sense, permitting divorce does "cause" divorce.

    So the phrase "permitting divorce causes more divorce" actually has some truth to it. :)

    Michael (21 March, 2007 08:49)

    Jumper,
    What make you think that divorce is the "easy" way out?

    jumper (21 March, 2007 10:42)

    Hmm...did I say that divorce is the "easy way out"?

    I did, however, say that divorce is the "easier way", which you would probably agree is not the same as saying it's "easy". And I said that in the context of those who would only work out their marriage if they didn't have another choice. :)

    Michael (21 March, 2007 11:24)

    Jumper,
    Like I said, there are other factors why married couple part ways.

    slim whale (21 March, 2007 16:39)

    you've articulated my thoughts, basang panaginip. my sentiments exactly.

    Michael (21 March, 2007 18:40)

    Thank Chris, welcome back.

    Shari (22 March, 2007 23:25)

    I think there's always a way out of marriage --- just not the legal way. And really, it's the Filipino's behavior to try to work things out first before taking the "easier way". Why are there many abused women who still stay with their husband despite the unhealthy relationship anyway? The only time they choose to leave is when they can't take things anymore --- for their and their children's welfare. Mapagtiisin ang mga Pinoy, if I may say so myself. =) Divorce will still be the last resort, for most people anyway.

    At least allow our fellow Filipinos to actually have a choice. They know how to think and make a decision; let them.

    It's sad, what happened in Egypt. I suddenly remember this girl (in junior high, I think) from Myspace who aired out her disgust for Bush's war against Iraq and "threatened" Bush. Seems like the Feds have their own online team. The girl was pulled out from her classes by some Secret Service agents, who actually took the "threat" seriously. Yeah right, as if she can walk past the gazillion bodyguards of Bush in White House.

    Haha, I wonder what it is with self-help books that make them so interesting for most people. But heck, to each his own. Maybe it works for them. ;)

    Isn't it funny that the people who screams for "peace" are actually the ones who are making "peace" impossible? Some overzealous *toot* like to negate things that don't go in line with their beliefs: if you don't believe in God, you're the devil...or something like that. Wala, pansin ko lang. ;)

    Gail T. (23 March, 2007 10:17)

    uy, thanks for the link and for letting me know. :) being linked in a well-written blog means i'm being read! (yay!)

    don't take this the wrong way; just humor me... i find it kinda funny that i'm linked in a post that is filed under the label atheism. i am a Christian, and i totally agree with your comment on self-help books. :D

    elber (23 March, 2007 17:46)

    Hey, thanks for the link.

    I feel like a bit of an outcast though - like I'm the comic relief at the end of all these serious posts about God, gods, and (supposedly) godly matters.

    Oh well... if my post can make somebody laugh or smile, that's cool.

    Anonymous (24 May, 2008 16:06)

    dont have sex, dont get pregnant, dont get married, dont get divorce :-)

    LesLie aNne .. (21 June, 2009 13:30)

    .. For me:


    .. we should not legalize ,divorce ..why?


    bcoz ..the two couples ..promise in front of GOD, yOur friends ,and family !



    of course if we promise ..we should do it !



    ..the importance in that is before we make any hard decision ,,we need to think .think ..about it!coz we cannot go back the time anymore ..




    so its more better that we will always think ..and think about things before it will get worst !ü



    .. hahahahah !! Ü



    ...... thats all!

Post a Comment